Patterns, tools, and practices for cultivating environments where both harmonious flow and healthy conflict can thrive
A conversation with colleagues Claudia, Mike, and MG about Navigating Conflict: Transforming Tensions into Growth sparked deeper questions. During a reflective walk afterward, nature provided insights through the contrasting behaviors of starlings and crows (When Systems Dance: A Ponder on Organizational Change and Conflict). This field guide emerged from that talk and walk – synthesizing practical tools and frameworks for working with the patterns we might see in our organizational systems.
How to Use This Guide
The guide provides a spectrum of common team patterns, starting with healthy ones, things you’ll likely observe with high-performing teams, and then progresses through muddy “not clear” territory, to various levels of not-so-good, and all the way to fully toxic.
Follow this iterative process to understand and influence team dynamics:
- Observe Patterns: Map current system behaviors, noting how patterns overlap and reinforce each other.
- Build Understanding: Contemplate and speculate why your system operates as it does.
- Select Tools: Choose context-appropriate tools, practices, and models that can nudge or shift patterns toward desired future states.
- Run Experiments: Design and conduct small experiments to amplify helpful patterns and dampen destructive ones. (Collect data!!!!)
- Study Results: Listen and see how your system responds through changing behaviors, interactions, and outcomes.
- Adapt & Iterate: Adjust your approach based on system feedback, then return to observation to see if/how you’re making the energy cost of virtue less than that of sin. (H/T to Dave Snowden).
Pattern 1: Flow States
- Starling Murmuration with each bird moving independently yet remaining perfectly attuned to the whole
What You’ll Observe:
- Fluid coordination without explicit direction
- The natural emergence of solutions
- High trust and psychological safety
- Balanced participation across team members
- Easy movement between divergent and convergent thinking
- Dynamic balance of different interaction styles
Tools for Supporting & Amplifying Flow States:
- Kantor Four Player Model
- Why: Framework for understanding and balancing team dynamics
- Key Roles: (Each role serves vital team needs)
- Movers: Initiate direction and actions
- Followers: Support and complete actions
- Opposers: Challenge and improve ideas
- Bystanders: Provide perspective and context
- Learn more: Helping Team Members Stretch Their Communication Muscles
- Working Agreements focused on psychological safety
- Why: Create explicit agreements about how to work together
- Learn more: Setting Team Expectations and Working Agreements
- Personal Maps
- Why: Build understanding through structured sharing of personal context
- Learn more: Getting to Know the Whole Human Being
- Structured Appreciation Practices
- Why: Regular recognition of contributions and learning
- Learn more:
- Process for Decision-making
- Why: Move authority to those with the most information
- Learn more: Decision-Making Patterns for Teams
- Catalyzing Deliberately Developmental Organizations
- Why: Foster a culture of continuous learning
- Learn more:
- Improv Exercises
- Why: Help people stretch their minds and think more flexibly, unconventionally, and creatively
- Learn more:
Pattern 2: Productive Conflict
- A Murder of Crows: each one clearly expressing its position and boundaries.
What You’ll Observe:
- “Problem to solve” language (Level 1 on Lyssa Adkins’ Ladder of Conflict)
- Focus on issues not personalities
- Curiosity about differing perspectives
- Active engagement in solution-finding
- “Yes, and…” building on ideas
Tools for Amplifying Productive Conflict:
See “Tools for Supporting & Amplifying Flow” above plus…
- Interest-Based Problem Solving
- Why: Move from positions to underlying interests
- Learn more: Interest-Based Conflict Resolution
- Powerful Questions & Clean Language
- Why: Non-leading questions to explore perspectives
- Learn more:
- Note and Vote Technique
- Why: Structure for gathering all voices
- Learn more: Effective Collaboration and Teamwork
- Adopt Different Vantage Points
- Why: A counterintuitive path to innovative solutions
- Learn more: Embrace the Mess: How Oblique Thinking Sparks Creativity
- Expose Competing Priorities
- Why: to become aware of the drag in the systems
- Learn more:
Pattern 3: Ambiguous or Unclear
As an observer or a participant, you might not be sure if things are good or bad…
Tells/Smells That Things Might Not be Good:
- Meetings consistently end with “no questions”, Pre/post-meeting dynamics
- Quick agreement without discussion or frequent reversed decisions
- People check others’ reactions before speaking
- Lack of healthy debate, informal power dynamics
- Decision Flow: Actual vs. stated decision paths
- Information Movement: Back-channel communications or undiscussable topics
- Gaps between stated values and actual team behaviors
These are all signs that a deeper investigation is warranted.
Suggested Tools to Explore / Reveal the System to Itself:
See Powerful Questions & Clean Language above [→ Pattern 2: Productive Conflict]
- Explore Levels of Trust and Ownership
- Why: Uncover what leadership trusts the team to own.
- Learn more: Trust, Ownership, and Vision: Necessary Conditions for Great Team Performance
- Fear & Vulnerability Retrospective
- Why: Maps current comfort/stretch/panic zones within the team
- Learn more: The Fear and Vulnerability Retrospective
- Silence Attribution Matrix
- Why: Framework for understanding types of silence
- Learn more: Lifting the Curse of Organizational Silence
- Understand Good vs Bad Meetings
- Why: Meetings should be an opportunity to connect, learn, educate, share, collaborate, & inspire. Are they?
- Learn More: Meeting Bloody Meetings
- Team Values
- Why: Values and principles serve as a north star for teams
- Learn More: Lean Agile Best Practices, Values, Principles and Virtues
Patterns in Crisis: Three Diagnostic Lenses
When systems move away from flow and/or productive conflict, multiple disturbing patterns often emerge simultaneously. Without intervention, things can deteriorate through:
- Escalating interpersonal tensions
- Formation of opposing camps
- Breakdown in psychological safety
- Emergence of toxic communication patterns
To begin to address things, it’s helpful to have a diagnostic approach to help understand current system dynamics. Like a doctor using different tools (X-rays, blood tests, physical exams), the following three lenses will help identify entry points for intervention and treatment.
Lens 1: Escalation Patterns (Lyssa Adkins)
Focus: Identify conflict intensity level and trajectory (For a more in-depth exploration, see this white paper by Lyssa Adkins)
Observable Patterns:
Level 2: Disagreement
- Guarded language and personal protection mechanisms
- “No, but…” responses replace dialogue
- Decreased listening, increased defensiveness
- Early signs of position-taking
Level 3: Contest
- Win/lose framing dominates discussions
- Strategic alliance formation
- Selective use of data to support positions
- Rising tension in interactions
Level 4: Crusade
- Ideological/moral framing of issues
- Right/wrong polarization
- Active conversion attempts
- Emotional intensity overshadows content
Level 5: World War
- Dehumanizing language
- Intentional system sabotage
- Complete communication breakdown
- Return path seems impossible
Lens 2: Relationship Dynamics (Karpman’s Drama Triangle)
Focus: Identify stuck relationship patterns. (For a more in-depth exploration, see this Wikipedia article)
Observable Patterns:
Victim Role
- “Nothing I can do” language
- Active responsibility avoidance
- Seeking rescuers/enablers
- Learned helplessness signs
Persecutor Role
- “They always…” accusations
- Rigid position-holding
- Constant fault-finding
- Control-seeking behaviors
Rescuer Role
- Unsolicited problem-solving
- Creating dependency
- Conflict avoidance
- Capability suppression
Lens 3: Toxic Behaviors (Four Horsemen)
Focus: Identify specific destructive interaction patterns. (For a more in-depth exploration, see: this article on Gottman.com)
Observable Patterns:
Criticism
- “You never/always” statements
- Character attacks vs. behavior focus
- Global negative judgments
- Blame-shame cycles
Contempt
- Non-verbal dismissal (eye-rolling)
- Hostile humor/sarcasm
- Public mockery
- Superiority displays
Defensiveness
- Immediate counter-attacks
- Chronic “yes, but” responses
- Responsibility deflection
- Attack-defend cycles
Stonewalling
- Physical/emotional withdrawal
- Communication shutdown
- Emotional flooding signs
- Connection refusal
Common Interaction / Reinforcing Patterns
Distress/crisis patterns can interact, reinforce and sometimes mask each other, creating not-so-virtuous loops, Without intervention, things can deteriorate rapidly driving further escalation
e.g:
Escalation → Drama → Toxicity
Disagreement → victim stance → criticism → further escalation
Toxicity → Drama → Escalation
Contempt → persecutor role → conflict elevation → more toxic responses
Entry Points for Intervention to Crisis Dynamics
1. Establish Safety First
Why: Required foundation before other interventions can succeed.
Key Actions:
- Address immediate toxic behaviors
- Create basic psychological safety guardrails
- Establish clear communication guidelines
- Build trust incrementally
Tools:
- Working Agreements [→ Pattern 1: Flow States]
- I-Statement Framework for feedback.
- Structured breathers/timeouts
- Note and Vote for safe participation [→ Pattern 2: Productive Conflict] and Team Safety Check
- Fear & Vulnerability Retrospective [→ Pattern 3: Unclear States]
2. Transform Relationship Patterns
Why: Break destructive cycles, and establish healthier dynamics.
Key Actions:
- Help shift from drama roles to empowered stances
- Build new interaction patterns
- Practice healthy responses
- Reframe challenges constructively
Tools:
- Personal Maps [→ Pattern 1: Flow States]
- Kantor Four Player Model roles [→ Pattern 1: Flow States]
- Powerful Questions & Clean Language [→ Pattern 2: Productive Conflict]
- Interest-Based Problem Solving [→ Pattern 2: Productive Conflict]
- The Empowerment Dynamic. See the book
- Evidence/Inference/Impact Model. See Clean Feedback Wraps
- Antidotes to Toxins/Dysfunctional Behavior – See The Four Horsemen: The Antidotes and Dealing w Dysfunctional Styles of Behavior
3. Evolve Systematically
Why: Gradual obtainment of productive conflict and flow states.
Key Actions:
- Move down the escalation ladder one level at a time
- Build competence at each level
- Celebrate small wins
- Maintain momentum
- Improve the environment (Lewin’s equation)
Tools:
- Alliance Building Framework. See Building Alliances: The Key to Continuous Improvement
- Regular Retrospectives. See this collection of articles and Team Safety Check
- Structured Appreciation Practices [→ Pattern 1: Flow States]
- Leadership Evolution. See
Experiment Design Guidelines
When designing experiments to amplify beneficial patterns and dampen destructive ones, keep in mind that you’re observing living systems and your context is unique. Every tool/approach mentioned in this guide is a starting point, not a prescription. The list is not intended to be exhaustive. With that in mind, here’s one way you might proceed:
1. Assess Current State
- Map observed patterns to diagnostic lenses
- Check /confirm psychological safety levels
- Identify primary engagement points
- Mind your cognitive biases in assessment
2. Design Small Experiments
- Choose tools matching the current system state
- Generally start with low-risk ideas
- Plan how you’ll collect impact data:
- Qualitative: Stories, observations, retrospective themes
- Quantitative: Relevant team and system metrics
- Pattern emergence over time
3. Monitor & Adjust
- Watch for pattern shifts
- Note both intended and unintended effects
- Adjust approach based on system feedback
- Document what works
4. Build Sustainability
- Transfer ownership to the team
- Establish leading indicators/early warning systems
- Create feedback loops for continuous learning
Note on metrics: Measuring system patterns is an art and science of its own. Perhaps we’ll explore specific approaches to qualitative and quantitative measurement in a future field guide. For now, focus on noticing patterns and collecting whatever data feels most relevant to your current experiments. You might find some starting points in the following posts:
Explore More: Join Me for a Walk & Talk
Want to explore how these patterns show up in your system? Interested in how you can transform your leadership approach and catalyze meaningful change in your organization? Got ideas to share about other tools and experiments? Let’s chat over coffee …